[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: J2EE connector resource adaptor
you are right with the EJB specification,
but it is only an specification, no implmentation.
Why shouldn't xmlBlaster be an implementation of a message
I find this idea great.
The whole landscape of EJB will be opened to us.
Or we will be open for them??? ;-)
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-xmlblaster at xmlBlaster.org
> [mailto:owner-xmlblaster at xmlBlaster.org]Im Auftrag von Manuel Kron
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2001 11:51
> An: xmlblaster at xmlBlaster.org
> Betreff: Re: J2EE connector resource adaptor
> why you build an j2ee adapter. It sounds very good but i think it makes no
> sense. Look at the EJB2.0 specification. In this specifiaction, there is a
> chapter about Message-driven Beans. Sun has defined a new Bean typ
> "Message-driven Bean" which represents message-oriented
> middleware. I think this is the
> accurate way for j2ee complaint.
> Bye Bye,
> Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net