Re: [xmlblaster] Transactional pub/sub

[Marcel Ruff <mr at marcelruff.info>]

David Hooker wrote:

> Hi-
>
> Is anyone doing any work on transactional messaging in xmlBlaster?
Hi David,

transaction support is probably the last big thing missing with xmlBlaster.
Some people told me they are thinking of adding it, but i think
nobody really started with it.

>  I
> have a requirement in my system which may require a scenario where I
> publish multiple messages to xmlBlaster, but they shouldn't actually
> send until I commit the messages.  This would ensure that all messages
> are committed to the bus together, or none are.
>
> If no one is working on this, I may take this on in the not-too-distant
> future, as this will be important to me.  Thanks.
It would be nice to start a technical discussion on the xmlblaster-devel 
list before you start,
to collect ideas and find the best approach for MoMs (including cluster 
support and
easy integrating third party transaction aware software, allowing long 
term transactions etc.).

If you are willing to donate this effort to xmlBlaster.org we would 
provide you cvs  write access,

best regards,

Marcel