Re: [xmlblaster] bug or feature ?

["Juergen Prinz" <Juergen.Prinz at avitech-ag.com>]

I asked out of curiosity. Internally , we use a combination of CDATA and
'\000' etc. 


> Jürgen Prinz wrote:
> > The result of MessageUnit.toXml may not be a well-formed Xml-Document, 
> > if the content includes characters as '<' or \000.
> 
> The C++ MessageUnit.toXml() and Java MsgUnit.toXml() methods
> are mainly for logging. They are not used operational.
> 
> The Java variant uses a CDATA section:
> 
>    <content><![CDATA[BlaBlaBla]]></content>
> 
> which helps a bit but still may fail with binary contents
> containing ']]>' or '<![CDATA[' tokens.
> 
> An approach would be to check the content and do a Base64
> encoding when offending tokens are found:
> 
>   <content encoding='base64'>QmxhQmxhQmxh</content>
> 
> We than would need to update C++ and C to behave same as java.
> 
> Is this a reasonable approach?
> 
>  >
> > Are there "official"
> > routines for encryption / decryption ?
> Are you talking about our authentication plugin?
> 
> > 
> > Out of curiosity
> > 
> > J. Prinz
> > 
> > 
> 
> best regards
> 
> Marcel
> 
> -- 
> http://www.xmlBlaster.org
> 
--