[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: Browser callbacks with XMLBlaster

Michele.Laghi at swisscom.com wrote:

I think that having an own server and an own homepage is always an advantage. Anyway SourceForge is centralized and always a good page on which to start searching for Open Source projects. For that reason I think it would be a good idea to be present there too (for example JBoss has its own page and is present on SourceForge too). So I personally would prefere to keep our project where it is but at the same time publish and make it available on SourceForge.

If somebody is willing to do it, it is possibly a good idea.
I heared Sourceforge has a compile farm with all OS you can think of
this would be nice to test our C++ clients.
Probably they even have some Windows boxes which i never
could test on :-)


Saluti Michele

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Heinrich Götzger [mailto:goetzger at gmx.net]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 9. August 2002 10:53
An: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
Betreff: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: Browser callbacks with XMLBlaster

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Marcel Ruff wrote:

Ben Cox wrote:

Also, would you ever considered moving the project to an

open source

development server like Sourceforge? I suspect that both usage and
the active participation of other developers would increase.

What do the others on this mailing list think about Sourceforge?
Currently i like our solution but probably i'm wrong.

What would be the benefit of moving to SourceForge in oppoosite to have
the server like it is?

I like our solution as well. We propose distributed systems, so
why don't provide it in a distributed manner?